
How do you save electricity?
You could save electricity by not leaving your TV on standby, because you don’t really need to leave your TV on standby. But then again, standby mode adds functionality and improves the user experience. You could save electricity by watching less TV. You could just stop watching TV, and go for a run. Better yet plant some trees. You’d get some exercise, you’d save electricity, you’d help the carbon/oxygen balance and you’d feel good about yourself.
But you don’t want to do that. You want to watch TV.
You could watch TV for seven hours a day for the rest of your life. Would that be a waste of life? It depends how much you like watching TV. So really, the question is, what is waste? How do we define waste?
Is it wasteful to use the technology we create to improve our lives? If you think so, then maybe you should be planting those trees right now, not reading this article.
So, are we really being eco-friendly by conserving energy?
Reference
In the last article we compared electric hand dryers with paper hand towels and found that electric hand dryers are surprisingly more eco-friendly than hand towels when you actually analyse the carbon emission figures. In this article I am going to follow on from that articles conclusion, by suggesting that energy conservation is not necessarily eco-friendly, particularly in the ways that most people attempt to achieve it, or understand it.
Energy conservation gone wrong
It’s good to save energy. As businesses we would be stupid not to be refining processes in order to reduce our energy usage and improve our efficiency, lowering costs, working better with the environment and showing our customers that we are a responsible business. But before we start trying to save energy or be more energy efficient first we must clearly define what is effectively improving our user experience and what is actually just wasteful.
Defining waste isn’t that easy
The problem is, defining what is waste isn’t straight forward. How do you define waste? We’ll be looking at how you do this in a future article, so subscribe today, to get the answer delivered to your feed reader. Find out more about free subscriptions here.
Surely saving energy can’t ever be bad for the environment?
Indiscriminately saving energy can be bad for business, but it can also be bad for the environment.
Going back to the hand dryers discussed in the previous article: In 1950 I’d imagine that electric hand dryers may have been less energy efficient than building your own log fire every time you dried your hands. But now they are more energy efficient than paper (in many contexts). But (hyperthetically) if people only considered the present day scenario back in 1950, every eco-friendly minded person would’ve chosen hand towels over electric hand dryers because it would’ve been far better for the environment. But that is not the case today because electric hand dryers have developed and continue to do so.
Is there really any point turning your TV off?

Before you do, consider whether you would prefer it on. If we comprimise our lifestyles based on energy consumption by not using the technological features we have created to improve our lives, we are choosing paper towels over electric hand dryers. Is it better that we slow down and comprimise for the sake of the short term environmental benefits, or is it better to concentrate on what is actually important: changing the way we innovate.
We blame the electrical products and we blame ourselves for using them because that is what fuels global warming and the poisoning of environments and the atmosphere. But unless you’re prepared to stop watching TV and start planting trees instead there has to be another way.
And there is…
By showing businesses that consumers are truly concerned about the environment the businesses will be forced to respond accordingly in order to thrive and one day, just to survive.
Demand fuels change. Demand for technological answers that improve our lives is increasing, not decreasing. But this has an impact on the environment. Something has to give. If you want it to be demand then stop watching TV and start planting trees. If you don’t care about the environment leave your TV on standby overnight. If you want both to get better, choose businesses that care about the environment.
By directing consumer demand intelligently we can force change in innovation, which saves the environment. Don’t switch your TV off. Switch your TV manufacturer. Don’t turn your heating down, choose a green energy provider. By shifting demand to green products without compromising user experience businesses are getting the fuel they need to innovate green products.
So next time you go to turn your light off with the environment in mind, think, how could I achieve the same or better with the power of my consumer demand?
Please do not print this page
115 billion sheets of paper are used annually for PC printers.
Source: id2.ca/downloads/eco-design-paper-facts.pdf

Dreadman
You should right what light bulbs we should use.
May 27th, 2008 at 9:32 pmmlp
You should learn how to spell, Dreadman.
And try compact fluorescent lightbulbs, or CFLs. Follow this link for more info: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls.
July 10th, 2008 at 12:25 amSnab
I really learnt a lot from this page you have a funny but realistic way of approaching to this issue.
December 29th, 2008 at 4:15 pmSnab
I really learnt a lot from this page you have a funny but realistic way of approaching to this issue.Do you mean we shouldn’t print ‘anything’?You can’t be serious.
December 29th, 2008 at 4:23 pm800hp Supra
This puts things into perspective
April 1st, 2009 at 9:01 pmrob
Its not solely about ’saving the environment’, its mainly about saving money! This is a very short sighted article which is more about laziness than anything else. If you turn off your tv or other electrical appliance off at the wall over night, then theres no harm to ‘user experience’ or anything you’re talking about like that as you are going to be asleep! and at the same time not paying for something you’re not using. At the end of the day its not saving the environment, its saving ourselves.
July 10th, 2009 at 11:18 amChris
I have to disagree rob. Before you can attempt to reduce waste properly, surely you have to be able to define waste.
The truth is, no-one needs to watch TV. No-one needs to drink hot tea. But we do. And it uses electricity, which burns carbon.
Ironically it’s you who has been short sighted in wrongly interpreting my article. I suggest you read it again.
July 10th, 2009 at 11:25 amRebecca
Another point that falls within your question that I’ve struggled with is what to do when you purchase green energy. Is it still better to be energy efficient then? Or is it better to use more energy under a green energy scheme in order to “invest” in a way, since the premium you’re paying for the green energy (supposedly) goes to more green energy projects?
July 27th, 2009 at 2:17 pmChris
Good point Rebecca,
Choosing a green energy supplier is like ‘voting’ for green energy. I suppose, if an energy suppliers market share is measured by revenue, then spending more with them is the same as upping your vote.
This really captures my point. Is it right to conserve energy indiscriminantly? No, I’d argue this is a silly approach.
We create technology to improve our lives. For me, if we are conserving indiscriminently then we are ‘wasting’ our innovations, to some degree.
At the same time, if we go around using electricity like there’s no tomorrow, one day there might be no tomorrow.
Really it comes down to, ‘what is waste?’.
I’ll be tackling that question in my next article.
Also, check back to the Consortium site over the next month, as we are adding a Green Energy Service, offering solar power, wind power and other green energy solutions for our customers.
I’ll post up the new links here when they are ready.
July 27th, 2009 at 2:28 pm