In this article we are going to try to determine which is more eco-friendly out of paper hand towels and electric hand dryers. There are two main factors involved in this comparison. One, carbon emissions produced as a result of delivery lorry driving and electricity usage. And secondly, waste disposal of the various materials.

So which is more eco-friendly?
First of all, lets look at carbon emissions
Let’s say your hand dryer lasts 10 years before it packs up. For the sake of argument let’s say both the hand towels and the hand dryers come from the same retailer and it’s 10 miles away.
We’ll base this comparison on 100 hand dryings a day.
If you bought a standard pack of 16 Consortium C Fold Hand Towel sleeves (that’s 2944 individual hand towels), you would have to re-order once a month. That means you would have 120 deliveries over the course of ten years. The lorry or delivery van is driving ten miles each time (what actually happens is the products get sent to a local depot and a van will take the individual items to the customers, but for this example we’ll say each product is driven ten miles in total). 120 deliveries multiplied by 10 miles equals 1200 miles.
Now, a loaded lorry does approximately 8-10 miles to the gallon. We’ll give the lorries the benefit of the doubt and call it 10 miles to the gallon. In litres that’s approximately 2.2 miles to the litre.
Now, using a ratio of 2.63kg CO2 for every litre of diesel burned (see Defra for CO2 conversion tables) that makes 1434.7kg CO2.
So by choosing the hand towels route you are going to be responsible for approximately 1434.7 kg of CO2 over the course of ten years.
That does not include the CO2 produced in the hand towels production process or their part to play in your businesses waste disposal transportation associated carbon emissions. The figure is actually going to be greater than 1434.7 kg.
Now the average hand dryer (based on a quick web search) uses about 0.022 KWH energy when in use. Again using the Defra conversion tables, that’s:
0.022 x 0.206 = 0.0045.
They also use about 0.005 KWH when on standby. So 0.005 x 87360 (the number of hours in ten years) = 436.8 kg if left on standby permanently for ten years. OK, so you could half that by turning off at night, but some people don’t do that, so we’ll assume you don’t. Now let’s round that up to 500 kg to take account of the 30 seconds of usage at 0.022 KWH when the hand dryer is in use.
The end result:
Hand towels: 1435kg CO2. Hand dryers: 500kg.
By the way, we’ll look at ways in which you can reduce your carbon emissions from purchase of consumable items in future posts, so stay tuned or grab a free subscription.
Now let’s look at the materials
A hand dryer is more complex and contains more materials, but has a far longer product life. On the other hand a hand dryer is made of less eco-friendly components, so when it does eventually have to be disposed of it will not degrade for thousands of years. However an electric hand dryer that has reached the end of it’s working life is classed as WEEE (See our WEEE page to learn more about WEEE). That means that:
[r]ecoverable materials, such as iron, copper, aluminium, glass or plastic are set aside to be reused for the production of new goods.
weee-forum.org
So an electric hand dryer may in fact be more frequently re-used/recycled than hand towels are by businesses.
The problem with hand towels is three fold. First of all they are usually not recyclable because they are used to dry hands etc and are therefore considered as being too dirty to recycle, so usually they are just thrown away. Secondly they are usually not made from recycled paper, so trees are being cut down in order to produce them. Thirdly they are consumable items, meaning you have to keep producing them, shipping them and disposing of them. This all produces carbon emissions.
Even though hand dryers may contain re-usable parts hand towels are probably still better for the environment in terms of materials and disposability. Unfortunately, because they are not recycled or made from recycled paper they probably come out in second place in this example.
Conclusion
In conclusion it seems electric hand dryers are the more environmentally friendly option here.
But there is another possibly more important reason why electric hand dryers may be more eco-friendly.
It is arguably better to encourage innovation that is more sustainable in the long–term than compromise for the sake of short-term eco-friendliness.
For example, hand towels may have been more eco-friendly than electric hand dryers 30 years ago, but as hand dryer technology develops, they will become more efficient. There is an argument that by encouraging conservation of electricity we discourage innovation that leads to breakthroughs that will make the electricity we do use far more efficient and therefore more eco-friendly. However there is no argument against recycling. Filling landfills is unsustainable whichever way you look at it.
The best things we can do to be eco-friendly are reduce the amount of waste we send to landfills, improve the efficiency of our electrical technology, find new greener ways to produce electricity and recycle.
OK, the case of the hand towel versus the hand dryer seems an odd one to demonstrate this point, but think about it. Do you envisage that we’ll be drying our hands with paper, that is delivered to us by lorries, taken away by trucks and buried in the ground a 1000 years in the future? Or do you think we’ll have super-efficient electric hand dryers made from recycled components that last 20 years and produce negligible amounts of CO2 from their use?
The conslusion is simple. To be truely eco-friendly you have to be eco-friendly both in the micro long-term and the macro long-term. In the case of hand dryers versus hand towels, hand dryers are the eco-friendly option in both scenarios.
To see how electric hand dryer technology is progressing check out the Dyson hand dryer innovation.
What do you use and what do you think?
Do you use hand dryers or hand towels? Do you consider the macro long-term as well as the micro long-term? And what the hell is the macro long-term? Is it just a phrase I made up?
Please do not print this page
115 billion sheets of paper are used annually for PC printers.
Source: id2.ca/downloads/eco-design-paper-facts.pdf

Me
It’s ‘route’.
April 29th, 2008 at 12:34 pmChris
So it is.
April 29th, 2008 at 12:59 pmPovl
I’ve just checked through your calculations, and can’t quite get them to add up. First of all, your use of units is horrible (sorry, I am a physicist). The unit of power consumption is watts (or kW); kWh is the amount of energy used (power consumption in kW * number of hours).
May 15th, 2008 at 2:43 pmIf we assume that a hand drier uses 1650 W (a typical figure from the web), each drying takes 30 s, and it is used 100 times per day, it uses a total of 1.375 kWh per day – or just over 5000 kWh over ten years – ignoring any standby power consumption. So using the Defra table, this is equivalent to 2150 kg CO2 – more than the paper hand towels in your example.
However, I do agree that driers probably are the more environmentally friendly route in the long term – as long as the materials that go into making them are reused. But calculations like yours don’t exactly strengthen that case…
Chris
Wow, my calculations were way out. Thanks for looking over them with a better understanding than I have. I kind of had an inclination that my calculations may have been a little less than perfect but I din’t think it would mean the opposite result.
Thanks for agreeing with my final conclusion. I think to some extent this will strengthen the point of the article:
If we look at the Dyson Air Blade (an innovation on the hand dryer technology) we can see that it uses 1600W while in use and only takes 10 seconds to dry the hands. You already know I’m not too good on calculations involving electricity but I think I’ve got it down now (correct me of I’m wrong):
1.6 x 1/6 = 0.267 kWh. That’s 974.55 kWh over ten years. In carbon that’s 200.76 kg.
So already we can see that this innovation has beaten the paper towels. That is kind of the point of the article. Thanks for your comment; that has really helped strengthen the point and helped me with my maths!
I hope I got my new calculations right. Let me know if I didn’t.
May 15th, 2008 at 3:24 pmPovl
Actually the calculations aren’t quite right this time, either.
The Dyson uses 1600 W when it’s on, 1 W in standby. It’s on for 1000 s (just over a quarter of an hour), so its power consumption is around 0.44 kWh per day (in contrast it uses 0.02 kWh in standby). This gives a total of around 1700 kWh in 10 years. If we use the Defra factor of 0.523 (based on actual average emissions in the last five years) this gives around 890 kg CO2. If we use power from a combined heat and power plant (the lowest non-renewable energy source in the Defra table), it gives 500 kg CO2. In my previous post I used the “long-term marginal factor”, which is roughly halfway in between.
So using improved technology (both in the drier and the power plant), the emissions can be brought down!
Of course there is still the issue of how the number for the paper towels is calculated. If we suddenly increase our hand drying to 400 uses per day, our hand drier will use approx. 2000 kg CO2. However, that cavernous lorry that brings out the paper towels every month can probably hold four boxes of paper towels just as easily as if it’s bringing out one box. And suddenly the numbers would indicate that the emissions from the paper towels would be lower again. So the basis for the paper towel calculation is probably not quite right, either.
May 15th, 2008 at 4:51 pmChris
That is a valid point well made.
Additionally we have not considered the CO2 emmissions produced from the manufacture of the paper towels. Trees must be chopped, wood must be transported and turned into paper, probably died and then packaged and shipped. All of this produces C02 and has other negative effects on the environment.
Futhermore the used paper towels must be disposed of. This has an impact on C02 emissions produced by waste disposal businesses.
I suppose you could liken the electric hand dryer to bringing the hand drying process ‘in-house’ where as purchasing hand towels is like outsourcing. Hand towel usage involves a large process from tree to land fill, where as the electric hand dryer brings the whole process into your business, with the exception of the electricity, which in the vast majority of cases must be outsourced, but perhaps that will be the next major change in eco-friendly business.
May 16th, 2008 at 9:04 amalan tomlinson
The arguement is still flawed as the lorry delivering the towels will be on a “milk round” and also delivering other stuff to the same building so the contribution of the lorry is only the additional fuel consumption created by the extra weight of the towels. The quantity delivered is irrelevant with this argument
June 29th, 2008 at 10:40 amu green
u r speaking rubbish. paper towels are more efficenit are is more portable wat if you are wet in the car tissues are used and anyways think bout it message me
July 7th, 2008 at 10:33 amChris
Don’t be so hasty to protect the paper towels. While I appreciate your need to dry your hands when you’re in the car, remember that paper, once used, is thrown in the bin. The bin is then driven to a landfill. Then, new paper towels are driven to your business to replace the used ones.
So yes, I guess I am speaking rubbish. But mostly I’m speaking carbon emissions, which is the more important factor in this arguement.
July 9th, 2008 at 10:03 amTodd
Interesting artice Chris. My current employer is comendable in using 100% post consumer paper towels.
July 11th, 2008 at 8:01 pmYou state paper towel cannot be recycled because it is dirty. Is this the case? I would have thought the refining process would remove contaminates allowing used paper towels to be recycled?
Chris
Strictly speaking you should be able to recycle paper towels if they are only used for drying hands. However because we can’t be sure that they are only used for drying hands they tend to get thrown in the bin.
Do you recycle yours?
July 14th, 2008 at 8:48 amManuel
Hum … paper towels is organic. When not recycled, it goes on landfill, which produces methane . Not so good …
Thing is we need to decrease consumption of anykind, including paper towel, hand dryers, right ? From that, why not use our own pants to dry our (fresh cleaned) hands ???
Simple and really efficient
Stop to be assisted by those gadgets.
Is anybody use his own clothes to dry his hands ??
August 14th, 2008 at 2:37 pmRich
What about the good old fashioned textile towel that is washed and re-used. Probably some stupid health and safety argument against them.
October 22nd, 2008 at 2:55 pmMartin
Paper towels are not really recyclable – they are designed to maintain their structure when wet, thus making it difficult to break them down in the mulching process. They are compostable, but on an office scale this is usually not particularly viable and the process would invovle the release of greenhouse gases. I agree that the ever improving efficiency of electric driers, combined with the inevitable rise in the proportion of electricty drawn from renewable sources means that driers are surely the most sustainable option.
November 28th, 2008 at 11:43 amHave you considered the difference between automatic and button-operated driers? My guess is that automatics are used for shorter time periods (I may be wrong), but does the mechanism which makes them automatic (sensors etc.) make them less energy efficient?
Curious
Thanks for the article Chris, this is exactly the research and debate I was looking for. Martin – You raise a good comparison follow-up about the electric hand dryer as to the automatic versus the push button models. I am no mechanical engineer, however I encourage someone to review this topic, as I would love to hear the outcome.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:27 pmLowell
Um, there is a little problem with the calculation for the hand driers. What about the CO2 in volved with the manufacturing and the collection of the materials? There has to be signifigant CO2 production in those activites… we only looked at the energy use for the hand driers.
August 5th, 2009 at 5:27 pmTim Pollard
The honest answer is that the judgement is enormously difficult to achive without life cycle assessments of each product and because of the variables of performance and time. Which, incidentally, is the challenge set for many ’sustainable’ products about which many spurious claims are being made by ever more desperate manufacturers and retailers.
August 19th, 2009 at 2:54 pmWe also have to understand the ‘hidden’ implications i.e. farmers switch from food crops to energy crops causes food shrtages.
A study by the University of Westminster (who?) found that warm-air dryers “significantly increase general bacterial counts on the hands by an average of 255%”, whereas towels reduced general bacterial counts “by an average of 58% (paper) and 45% (cotton)”. So perhaps the first question we should ask is whether the comparative products are fit for purpose?
T-One
Continuous Cloth towels beat both of the above mentioned hands down. One cloth roll towel washed 75 times, replaces about 30,000 single-fold paper towels.
September 11th, 2009 at 3:13 pmhttp://www.lanuova.co.nz/index.php?page=cabinet-towels
Tork UK
Nicely written article Chris. I am going to add a few more points to this as i feel that certain aspects have been left out. Leading paper towel brands use responsibly – sourced fibre including recycled paper. Once used, paper towels can be recycled up to 5 times or used for energy reclamation.
The reason that i feel paper towels are the better option is pretty much down to hand hygiene. The bacteria levels on hands increases by up to 254% after washing and drying with traditional warm air dryers. ( University of Westminster study, 2008 comparing the three different hand drying methods).. With the current Influenza issue at the moment paper towels are the better option reducing the amount of bacteria on hands after washing by 45% – 77%.
October 5th, 2009 at 8:30 amChris
Very good points. I’d agree. Makes me wonder just how hygeinic cloth towels are though.
October 5th, 2009 at 12:02 pmJP
If you read an earlier comment by Tim Pollard you wouldn’t be wondering.
October 15th, 2009 at 5:09 amJP
Not many people read the comments section. Maybe you should intergrate the great insites of commentors into the article, incase a lot of people get misinformed by the article?
October 15th, 2009 at 5:12 amPeter
As Chris mentioned in one of the comments… There is a revolutionary hand drier called Dyson Air Blade which filters the air and gets rid off 99.9% bacteria, just like wet hand wipes or hand gels. So I think that the bacteria battle between hand driers, cloth or paper hand towels has been ended…
btw. very nice article and even nicer comments (some of ‘em). It’s very helpful, thank you Chris.
November 5th, 2009 at 9:22 pmHeather
Wouldn’t hand dryers be more profitable too? The company would only have the initial cost of the dryer and the energy bill to worry about where as with paper towels they need to be purchased continuously and then theres the maintenance cost of them as well. If this is true then why do so many companies still use paper towels? It doesn’t make sense to me. Don’t they want to make the most profit they can? Is the bacteria problem such a big issue that they wouldn’t want to buy hand dryers?
November 11th, 2009 at 2:57 amshabba
my work handriers are made in far east, does calculations include this part of the cycle? the shipping carbon emissions, port emissions from loading/unloading and moving the containers, the fluid leaking of the ships out at sea when they dump. The installers emissions, the regular safety checks needs someone to drive to the site.
November 18th, 2009 at 6:25 amLaureane
sweet….its strange but i was just in the bathroom and i washed my hands then looked between the hand dryer and the paper towel deciding, for the first time, which one i wanted to use. I began to wonder which was more environmentslly friendly and i realised that i had no idea. My uneducated guess would have been that it was the paper towel but thank goodness i researched it and thankgoodness for this article because now i understand and agree that the hand dryer is the more ecofriendly choice.
November 18th, 2009 at 10:13 pmbut i also like t-one’s statement. reuseable towels weren’t mentioned in the above and they seem like the practical, friendly approach….
thanks for the detailed infomation!
bluechilihead
Good article, even better dialogue spawned by it. In response to the question of profitability: in the case of a service or retail industry the comfort of the customer is far more important than the bottom line. Given that only one person can use a hand dryer at any given time while several people can, “grab and go” with paper towels, it is the bussiness’s intrest to provide towels. In the manufacturing, industrial sector it could be argued that the hand dryer would decrease productivity and therefore profitability. The more time workers are off the floor the less work they accomplish. Also it is important to remember that paper towels in restrooms are used for much more than just hands, eg. blowing nose, removing errant make-up, cleaning a childs face. Not only do these uses nessecitate providing them to restroom patrons, but would grossly affect the above calculations. For the record, I agree that a balance between current practices and advancements in future technologies must be implemented for success.
November 19th, 2009 at 11:10 amYour Mother
I think this was a very insightful piece on the environment
December 17th, 2009 at 9:36 pmYOYOYOman
Yo You get paper towel fro trees letting out lots of CO2
January 20th, 2010 at 5:04 pmCharlie
If you use an electricity company that supplies 100% renewable electricity, then the CO2 emissions of a hand dryer are virtually zero. So surely this is a no-brainer?
March 11th, 2010 at 6:32 pmNeil Marshall
There’s a Streamlined Life Cycle Analysis document available to help show how the the dryers vs hand towels argument goes.
http://www.airdri.com/hand_dryers/environment/
April 29th, 2010 at 2:12 pmDanE
None of this has convinced me. Without adding taking account of the energy used in manufacturing the paper towels and the energy used in fabricating a hand dryer you can’t you say one is better than the other? (not to mention the calculations in the article are wrong see Povl’s comments) At the moment the article reads like a advert for the Dyson Airblade not a well reasoned arguement.
April 30th, 2010 at 12:45 pm